Alexey Tarasov
2010-04-09 11:14:07 UTC
Hello.
I see considerably increased performance when creating over gnop -S 4096 virtual disk. Even when I create zpool over raw disks the performance is very bad and concurent writes stalls. When using gnop, zfs works VERY fast!
Btw, here is another discussion, may be there is a bug in a mav@ commit, because he has added support for >512 sector size:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-April/016495.html
Превед Украине! =)
My understanding was that even with 512-byte sectors ZFS still aligns its
on-disk data with > 4K alignment.
Do you see otherwise? What problem do you have?
--
Andriy Gapon
--
Alexey Tarasov
(\__/)
(='.'=)
E[: | | | | :]З
(")_(")
I see considerably increased performance when creating over gnop -S 4096 virtual disk. Even when I create zpool over raw disks the performance is very bad and concurent writes stalls. When using gnop, zfs works VERY fast!
Btw, here is another discussion, may be there is a bug in a mav@ commit, because he has added support for >512 sector size:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-April/016495.html
Превед Украине! =)
Hello.
I've tried all methods and realized that unfortunately the only working
method is gnop. So you can't use these disks for ZFS at all now.
Why? And what are you actually trying to do?I've tried all methods and realized that unfortunately the only working
method is gnop. So you can't use these disks for ZFS at all now.
My understanding was that even with 512-byte sectors ZFS still aligns its
on-disk data with > 4K alignment.
Do you see otherwise? What problem do you have?
--
Andriy Gapon
Alexey Tarasov
(\__/)
(='.'=)
E[: | | | | :]З
(")_(")